Today’s blog focuses on a list you can create to help you copyedit.
Creating a list is part of my process when reading another author’s manuscript. I use the list for my work too, but if you’ve edited your own writing, you’ll know how hard it is to find your mistakes.
Before I start – thank you to the people who pointed out the difference between proofreading and copyediting. Their definitions are in the comments of Proofreading (Part One). Also, thanks to everyone else for their comments. I had fun reading them all.
Monday’s blog took us part way through the second reading of a manuscript, but there’s still work to do on this pass.
While reading the manuscript for the second time, I create a list that includes:
- Words with hyphens or words I think should have a hyphen.
While writing a novel, it’s easy for an author to forget which format they used for a word. It’s better to keep word formats consistent, which can be difficult, especially when the dictionary offers a choice or two dictionaries disagree with each other.
- Words that are easy to type incorrectly, but the spell checker won’t find the error. There are many, so here are a few examples:
It’s/its
Their/there
Hear/here
Heard/herd
Where/were
Then/than
Then/the
This list grows with each new manuscript I read. Heard/herd came from the manuscript I’m currently editing.
- Words that are spelt differently in Canadian or American spelling. This is hard to catch because some spell checkers allow both forms. A difficult situation occurs if the author uses a Canadian spelling for one word and American for another. For example:
My pyjamas are the color of green olives. Pyjamas is in Canadian spelling. Color is in American.
Search for words that can be spelt with ‘ou’ or ‘o’ and words where a consonant may or may not be doubled, such as:
Favourite/favorite
Travelling/Traveling
- Words that can be spelt (spelled in the USA) two ways.
Toward/Towards
Backward/Backwards
Both are correct, but again consistency is important.
But what do you do with this list?
Even if you have read the manuscript in printed form, this is the point where a computer can help you eliminate errors.
In whatever word processing program you use, turn tracking on. Search the manuscript for each word in the list you’ve created during your second reading and make the appropriate changes. The author can decide to accept or reject the changes when he/she reads the suggested corrections.
Call me crazy, but I thought I was going to finish this subject in two blogs. We’re still not on to the third reading, but we’re getting there. My next post on copyediting will be on Monday.
If you have any tips to share, I’d love to add them to my process.
Thanks for reading . . .
Related articles about proofreading versus copyediting:
- To Proof or Not to Proof (theeditorandthebeast.wordpress.com)
- Partying with Punctuation (dodgingcommas.wordpress.com)
Kristina – Nice list. In my list of “real words that are the wrong words,” I search for “form/from” a lot, too…seems to be my own personal bugaboo.
And, this isn’t 100% on topic, but I use the “Add to Dictionary” and “Ignore” feature in MS Word to stop the software from picking up odd character and place names as mistakes in my manuscript. If I don’t do that, then those words get flagged so frequently that I start ignoring Spellcheck completely…and then miss things like “teh” and “tihng.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Matthew, Thanks for commenting. I’ll add your words to my list. I’m going to try the “Add to Dictionary” function. I’ve used “ignore”, but I think the add function will work well for slang etc.
LikeLike
I second Add to Dictionary. It works very well for slang and proper nouns.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Jan. This is definitely something to add to the process. My collection of new ideas is growing!
LikeLike
Interesting that the Canadian and American spellings are also different! I will have to keep that in mind. 🙂
These posts are quite enlightening! Thank you for sharing them.
LikeLike
Thanks Kirsten – My brother pointed out that I use both spellings and I have to force myself to pay attention to it.
LikeLike
I am British and also use the spellings in two different ways. However, I am pleased to say that my computer corrects my “English”
LikeLike
Katherine, I’ve figured out how to set my spell checker now. I’ve got it set to Canadian English and this seems to work well. Once I started noticing the different spellings, it became a game of sorts to find the American/Canadian/British words. I’ve been using non-Canadian spellings without realizing it.
LikeLike
How is “pyjamas” spelled in the US? That’s proper British English that is.
LikeLike
Pajamas. I really struggle with US v Canadian spelling. Hence happy to have an editor who can catch any of these mistakes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
SF and I read our manuscripts but are guilty of auto translating and miss errors. Then we have the computer read it to us. Ouch … it reads exactly what is there. OK the word “read” is only pronounced one way but we live with it. Reading out loud helps a lot, especialy if there is a pause and no comma present. Misspelled words come across strange when the computer reads it also and it can be a wake up call. All of this is done before we send it to editing.
I am learning from your blog. Thank you for writing it.
LikeLike
Detra, we all miss finding errors. I think it’s impossible to get them all. The word ‘read’ always makes me smile when my kindle reads it to me and it’s the wrong version. It’s great to hear you put in the effort before you send your work to editing. Thanks for the comment.
LikeLike
Detra – cool website. Love the owl photo.
LikeLike
Thank you,
achem … 🙂 Hawk – A The Ferruginous (fer-oo-jin-us) hawk named after the rust (ferrous) colouration on the back and shoulders and legs. She represents Aithera’s Chaka.
LikeLike
Oops. You can see my knowledge of birds needs improvement. I love to learn something new. Hope the hawk wasn’t insulted!
LikeLike
Dern I’m not even sure if my eyes would pick up something like toward or towards
LikeLike
Yup. That’s a tricky one. It’s why I use a global search at the end of a reading. It’s dull, but it does make a better manuscript.
LikeLike
Ugh I don’t think I could do that for every beta. But it’s a good idea as a last look on one’s own manuscript
LikeLiked by 1 person